Introduction

Young startups now earn more revenue per employee with tiny teams, while older SaaS companies carry big staffs and see slower growth per person.

What’s the problem it solves?

As small SaaS businesses shrink headcount and boost output, mid- and large-stage firms are ballooning their teams but losing efficiency. They need to learn how early-stage winners keep lean and fast.

Quick Summary

In recent years, < $1 million ARR startups cut their staff from 13 to 7 people and lifted ARR per person by 75%. They run with two-pizza teams and rely on AI tools and multi-skilled hires to move quickly.

By contrast, companies at $5 – 20 million ARR saw a 9% drop in ARR per employee, and those above $50 million ARR plunged 34%. Public SaaS firms now take almost five years to recover their sales and marketing costs, relying on old profits to fund slow growth.

This split creates a new “efficiency gap” where early-stage firms sprint ahead by staying lean, using generalists, and blending AI agents into their org chart-skills that larger firms must adopt to stay competitive.

Key Takeaways

• Startups under $1 million ARR now average 7 staff and $71 k ARR per person.
• Mid-stage firms ($5 – 50 million ARR) are less efficient year-over-year.
• Public SaaS companies’ CAC payback is about 57 months, a sign of bloated GTM.
• Small teams favor generalists, AI fluency, and multi-role hires over deep specialists.
• Legacy firms risk falling behind if they don’t shrink layers and boost output per head.

What to do

• Audit headcount vs. revenue: aim for higher ARR per person.
• Flatten management: turn senior roles into player-coach positions.
• Hire versatile hires who can tackle varied tasks and learn fast.
• Integrate AI agents to automate routine work and free team bandwidth.
• Replace rigid specialists with generalists who own full workflows.
• Set targets for CAC payback reduction and monitor quarterly progress.

‍