A simple but tough framework helps leaders see who’s really driving growth - and who’s just taking up space.
Leaders often fool themselves about their teams. They overvalue effort, loyalty, or past success and avoid making hard calls. This framework forces clarity on who is worth investing in and who needs to move on.
The article introduces a 2x2 matrix that rates team members by both performance (what they deliver now) and potential (their ability to grow into bigger roles). Most companies only look at results, but that misses future capacity.
Performance is judged by whether someone delivers on promises, understands business impact, and collaborates without causing drama. Potential is about strategic thinking, ability to represent the team with senior leaders, and whether others naturally follow their lead.
Once you plot your team, the picture becomes clear: low/low people need to exit, high/low need a reality check, low/high are useful steady contributors, and high/high deserve the bulk of your attention and growth opportunities. Leaders are warned not to inflate ratings or waste energy on the wrong people. The biggest returns come from investing in top-right quadrant players - often the ones embracing AI today.