Three breakout AI companies are rewriting sales rules. Anthropic, Cursor, and FAL show why quotas, old playbooks, and rigid plans no longer work.
Traditional SaaS sales models assume stable demand, easy-to-predict growth, and low costs to serve. But AI companies face hypergrowth, unpredictable adoption, and real unit costs. The old systems break, so new GTM strategies are needed.
At the SaaStr Annual AI Summit, leaders from Anthropic, Cursor, and FAL explained how they built hypergrowth without using standard sales structures. None of them rely on quotas. Instead, they use “shadow targets” or short-term goals because AI adoption moves too fast for annual planning.
These companies hire technical sales teams who can actually use the product and talk deeply with buyers. Unlike traditional SaaS, they don’t need to create demand-developers and users already push products into companies from the bottom up. This product-led growth model means revenue scales faster, even with leaner sales headcount.
A big reason for their success is heavy internal use of their own AI products, which both improves product quality and builds trust with customers. They also track new kinds of metrics-like product quality, customer spread, and feedback loops-because revenue lags behind usage and model strength. Economics also look different: AI products have higher serving costs but can charge value-based pricing tied to productivity gains.